{"id":21636,"date":"2022-03-24T06:21:16","date_gmt":"2022-03-24T06:21:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/?p=21636"},"modified":"2022-03-24T07:17:07","modified_gmt":"2022-03-24T07:17:07","slug":"doua-bune-si-una-lipsa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/?p=21636","title":{"rendered":"Dou\u0103 bune \u0219i una lips\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n\n

In lumina celor ce le voi spune m\u00e2ine, sau zilele astea v\u0103d o lege bun\u0103 trimis\u0103 spre promulgare la Iohannis. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

E vorba de procedura de constatare a amenzilor de circula\u021bie<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\u0103 rog, e vorba de sanc\u021biuni. In momentul de fa\u021b\u0103 contesta\u021bia se poate face doar la judec\u0103toria sau tribunalul de care apar\u021bine localitatea unde ai fost sanc\u021bionat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nu conteaz\u0103 de unde e\u0219ti tu, trebuie s\u0103 formulezi pl\u00e2ngerea \u0219i la o adic\u0103 s\u0103 te prezin\u021bi, tu dau avocatul t\u0103u la judec\u0103toria cu pricina, care poate s\u0103 fie \u00een pul\u0103 cu satelitul. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Acuma se schimb\u0103 \u0219i te adresezi judec\u0103toriei de care apar\u021bii tu, lucru care cumva are sens, c\u0103 Rom\u00e2nia nu e stat federal, cu legi diferite de la jude\u021b la jude\u021b. Din moment ce se judec\u0103 unitar ( in teorie , desigur), nu ar trebui s\u0103 conteze unde se judec\u0103, iar cet\u0103\u021beanul ar trebui ajutat \u00een cazul de fa\u021b\u0103 . <\/p>\n\n\n\n

De asemenea ac\u021biunea de contesta\u021bie va avea un formular, adic\u0103 se sistematizeaz\u0103 pl\u00e2ngerile astea. P\u00e2n\u0103 acum trebuia s\u0103 scrii tu jalb\u0103, s\u0103 \u0219tii limbajul judiciar \u0219i cutuma de expunere, pentru mult\u0103 lume era peste m\u00e2n\u0103 s\u0103 o fac\u0103 personal, iar avocatul cost\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mai e p\u00e2n\u0103 ajunge treaba ca in UK unde c\u00e2nd prime\u0219ti o sanc\u021biune \u021bi se cere mai \u00eent\u00e2i s\u0103 o accep\u021bi , iar dac\u0103 nu o accep\u021bi – fixed penalty notice ( merge s\u0103 fie judecat\u0103 ), dar e mai bine. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

E bine \u0219i partea cu amenzile. Ai 30 de zile dup\u0103 sentin\u021b\u0103 c\u0103 s\u0103 pl\u0103te\u0219ti. Nu pl\u0103te\u0219ti, e\u0219ti executat de suma cu pricina, sau, dac\u0103 nu au ce lua dup\u0103 tine se stabile\u0219te munc\u0103 \u00een folosul comunit\u0103\u021bii de banii \u0103ia. De regul\u0103 \u00een folosul primarului, dar ori\u0219ic\u00e2t, e un efort. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dac\u0103 nu execu\u021bi nici sarcina asta – aici au dat-o in bar\u0103, c\u0103 se prevede \u00eenchisoare sau amend\u0103. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pai cum po\u021bi s\u0103 prevezi posibilitatea de a amend\u0103 pe unul, ca pedeapsa c\u0103 nu pl\u0103te\u0219te amenda…? \u0102\u0219tia nu le au cu programarea, c\u0103 ar fi observat pericolul de lup infinit. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Partea care lipse\u0219te e “ceva” \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu cazul in care totu\u0219i c\u00e2\u0219tigi contesta\u021bia. C\u0103 sunt cheltuieli de judecat\u0103 \u00een joc, m\u0103 prive\u0219te direct. Tot a\u0219a ar trebui s\u0103 fie. 30 de zile s\u0103 fie pl\u0103tite de unitatea care a pierdut , sau executare silit\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0218i poate nu a fi r\u0103u s\u0103 se fac\u0103 \u00eenscrierea sentin\u021bei \u00een dosarul de evaluare a performan\u021bei activit\u0103\u021bii accentului respectiv. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nu zic s\u0103 fie dat afar\u0103, sanc\u021bionat disciplinar, plm, c\u0103 cu excep\u021bia cazului c\u00e2nd se impune cercetarea pentru abuz, poate fi vorba de gre\u0219eli \u00een interpretarea legii sau probe insuficiente, sau prost administrate, dar reprezint\u0103 totu\u0219i aspecte ce \u021bin de calitatea muncii agentului. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pe scurt, ai dat anul \u0103sta 100 de amenzi ( dau c\u00e2t mai au \u0103\u0219tia planul acuma, c\u0103 nu mai \u0219tiu ), din care 30 au fost contestate. 25 au fost anulate. Asta \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 ai o rata de acurate\u021be a muncii de 75%. Pentru promovare , m\u0103rire de salariu trebuie s\u0103 existe ceva prag de performan\u021b\u0103. Dac\u0103 agentul e prea muci, e incompatibil cu func\u021bia. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nu vreau s\u0103 avansez eu cifre zic doar c\u0103 ar trebui s\u0103 existe trasabilitatea asta \u0219i indicatorul \u0103sta de performan\u021b\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dup\u0103 aia po\u021bi analiza mai departe, la nivel de agent, de sec\u021bie de poli\u021bie , sau chiar la nivel de \u021bar\u0103. Care sunt cele mai anulate amenzi. S\u0103 zicem c\u0103 ar fi cele de neacordare de prioritate la trecerea pentru pietoni ( am ales aleatoriu, ca exerci\u021biu de ra\u021bionament). Care sunt motivele cele mai dese? Lips\u0103 de probe? Interpretarea incorect\u0103 a legii? Dac\u0103 e prima, agen\u021bii trebuie sprijini\u021bi \u0219i instrui\u021bi s\u0103 produc\u0103 probe \u0219i s\u0103 sanc\u021bioneze corect. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dac\u0103 e a doua, trebuie instrui\u021bi s\u0103 interpreteze \u0219i s\u0103 legea corect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bine\u00een\u021beles c\u0103 eu visez, la stat nu merge managementul ca la privat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In lumina celor ce le voi spune m\u00e2ine, sau zilele astea v\u0103d o lege bun\u0103 trimis\u0103 spre promulgare la Iohannis. E vorba de procedura de…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":21637,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[744,170],"tags":[4796],"class_list":["post-21636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-and-order","category-politice","tag-contestarea-amenzilor-de-circulatie-la-domiciliu"],"views":784,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Justitia-sketch.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4Eq23-5CY","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21636"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21636\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21638,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21636\/revisions\/21638"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/21637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}