{"id":31824,"date":"2025-06-08T02:49:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-08T01:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/?p=31824"},"modified":"2025-06-07T15:51:35","modified_gmt":"2025-06-07T14:51:35","slug":"fmi-in-cel-mai-bun-caz-ignorabili","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/?p=31824","title":{"rendered":"FMI \u00een cel mai bun caz, ignorabili"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n\n

\u00cen cel mai r\u0103u, ar trebui prin\u0219i pe r\u00e2nd, c\u00e2nd vin \u00een \u021bar\u0103, b\u0103tu\u021bi cu pijamaua ud\u0103 \u00een beci \u0219i trimi\u0219i la reanimare la Sf. Pantelimon<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cineva a pl\u0103tit, c\u0103 nu \u00eemi imaginez c\u0103 toate publica\u021biile au preluat aprobator ca boii \u0219i vacile CAP-ului, s\u0103 se r\u0103sp\u00e2ndeasc\u0103 raportul \u0103lora ( care e o fi\u021buic\u0103 lipsit\u0103 de orice valoare) c\u0103 domne TREBUIE s\u0103 cre\u0219te\u021bi taxe \u0219i austeritate \u0219i pule \u00een pizde.

\u00cen primul r\u00e2nd IMF sunt ni\u0219te gropari. C\u00e2nd vor s\u0103 vin\u0103 \u00een \u021bar\u0103, dac\u0103 nu e moart\u0103 nu-i prime\u0219ti. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

C\u00e2nd zic c\u0103 trimit delega\u021bie nu le r\u0103spunzi la mesaj; dac\u0103 \u00eei prinzi la frontier\u0103, le tai pa\u0219aportul pe sistem suveranist \u0219i \u00eei trimi\u021bi \u00eenapoi; dac\u0103 gui\u021b\u0103 \u00een comunicate de pres\u0103 \u0219i rapoarte, nu-i bagi \u00een seam\u0103, dac\u0103 te trag unii de la agen\u021bii de rating c\u0103 a zis \u201dFMI\u201d c\u0103 – cum auzi FMI le scapi o flegm\u0103 \u00een muie \u0219i-\u021bi ceri scuze – \u00eei pui s\u0103 repete, dac\u0103 mai zic o dat\u0103 \u201dFMI\u201d, direct mucioas\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Raportul lor nu e prost pentru c\u0103 nu e actual, c\u0103 o parte din m\u0103suri s-au implementat, ci pentru c\u0103 orice h\u00e2rtie igienic\u0103 cu clasificarea \u201dHigh-Level Summary Technical Assistance Reports\u201d care nu cuprinde baza concluziilor lor \u0219i mecanismele logice, ci doar instruc\u021biuni seci \u0219i din care nu po\u021bi discerne nici m\u0103car inten\u021bia nu e bun\u0103 nici m\u0103car la aia, s\u0103 te \u0219tergi cu ea. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Raportull pizdii<\/a> , scris probabil cu Chat GPT de repeten\u021bii clasei nu spune efectiv nimic, b\u0103, dar NIMIC, util sau descifrabil <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nu are nimic la supplementary materials, s\u0103 zici c\u0103 \u0103sta e un sumar concluzionat din ceva – din pizda m\u0103-sii, aia. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Ce zic acolo e c\u0103 Rom\u00e2nia colecteaz\u0103 prea pu\u021bine taxe relativ la GDP, a treia cea mai mic\u0103 colectare \u0219i s\u0103 mai pun\u0103, c\u0103 au unde.
As Romania has the third lowest
tax-to-GDP in the European Union (EU), there is ample room for tax policy to complement the ongoing
digital transformation of the tax administration to generate additional revenue. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Zic \u00een raport c\u0103 Rom\u00e2nia are cea mai mare taxare pe munc\u0103 la salarii mici, iar salariile medii in Rom\u00e2nia sunt printre cele mai mici din UE, corect, drept urmare , propun m\u0103sura asta:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n


Moving from the single 10 percent PIT tax rate on labor income to a system with two marginal tax rates,
15 and 25 percent, with the latter applicable at the 90 th income percentile.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Deci 10% taxe la salarii mici e prea pu\u021bin, hai s\u0103 facem 15% la cele mai mici \u0219i 25% la salariile cele mai mari 10% din ele, adic\u0103 IT-ul \u0219i managementul , c\u0103 v\u0103 explic\u0103 Mandea.
Bun, deci taxare 43+5% la cap\u0103tul de jos = 48% \u0219i 68% la cap\u0103tul de sus, nu exist\u0103 \u00een lume, cred, a\u0219a ceva. Genial!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Au ei o schem\u0103 tare de tot – s\u0103 se reduc\u0103, \u00een schimb contribu\u021biile la s\u0103n\u0103tate. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n


To reduce the labor tax wedge on most taxpayers, the health insurance contribution should be significantly reduced or eliminated<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Efectiv de ce pula mea s\u0103 faci asta? De ce pula mea s\u0103 devii mai netransparent cu contribu\u021biile, ca s\u0103 nu poat\u0103 s\u0103-\u021bi scoat\u0103, pe urm\u0103, nimeni ochii cu \u201dHEI, AM DAT BANI LA S\u0102N\u0102TATE, FUTU-VA MOR\u021aII \u00ceN GUR\u0102, CE PULA MEA E LA UPU?!\u201d, c\u0103 asta e , r\u0103m\u00e2ne un impozit cu care nu \u0219tii ce se \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103.
NU , nu spun cu c\u00e2t s\u0103 reduci contribu\u021bia, sau la ce schem\u0103 ajungi dac-o sco\u021bi. Gen, de unde pula mea au scos cifrele \u0219i care e c\u00e2\u0219tigul? Efectiv mai lache\u021bi dec\u00e2t un elev de liceu economic de la Caracal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zic ei: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Pension contributions should either be non-deductible, or pension incomes should be taxed.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Asta e e legat de cum se taxeaz\u0103 salariile: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Din suma brut\u0103 se re\u021bin contribu\u021biile la s\u0103n\u0103tate – cum e normal!, c\u0103 e un cost!, o tax\u0103, apoi contribu\u021biile la pensii – TOT LA FEL DE NORMAL, c\u0103-s obligatorii, e o asigurare social\u0103, practic pl\u0103te\u0219ti pensiile altora imediat din ea, f\u0103r\u0103 vreo garan\u021bie privin beneficiile la tine.

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Eh, \u0103\u0219tia zic , nu domne, c\u0103 a\u0219a , pensia e netaxat\u0103!
C\u0103 ori ar trebui taxate contribu\u021biile la pensie, ori taxat\u0103 pensia, c\u0103-s bani netaxa\u021bi. \u0218i dac\u0103 te ui\u021bi a\u0219a, sunt netaxa\u021bi, da. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Doar c\u0103 pensia este o tax\u0103 \u00een sine: \u021ai se re\u021bine un sfert din salariul c\u00e2\u0219tigat, pe care nu \u00eei prime\u0219ti musai \u00eenapoi ca bani, ci prime\u0219ti la finalul unui stagiu de munc\u0103 impus de stat o sum\u0103 de bani, tu sau apar\u021bin\u0103torii t\u0103i ( so\u021bia , sau copii minori sau care studiaz\u0103- pensie de urma\u0219), \u00eentr-un cuantum decis de stat prin varii formule, care \u00eencearc\u0103 s\u0103 fie corelat la contributivitate, sau nu – dac\u0103 vorbim de pensii speciale. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00cen condi\u021biile \u0103stea s\u0103 taxezi \u00eenainte reprezint\u0103 taxare dubl\u0103. S\u0103 taxezi dup\u0103 e tot cam a\u0219a, dar nu aia conteaz\u0103, ci c\u0103 e irelevant, c\u0103 taxezi bani da\u021bi de stat. E un artificiu matematic, altfel nu are sens s\u0103 taxezi bani da\u021bi de stat, ca un serviciu pentru o tax\u0103. Mai simplu calculezi suma pe care o d\u0103 statul \u00eenapoi.
Da, \u0219tiu c\u0103 statul taxeaz\u0103 din 2024 pensiile mai mari de 3000 de lei – conceptual e o prostie, dar de drept, e un artificiul matematic pentru a t\u0103ia pensiile celor care le au peste 3000 de lei , la care au ajuns tot pe baza formulelor statului. Juridic nu ai voie s\u0103 tai cuiva un drept ob\u021binut, adic\u0103 s\u0103-i reduci pensia sau salariul – c\u0103 e un abuz s\u0103-\u021bi dau cu o m\u00e2n\u0103 \u0219i pe urm\u0103 s\u0103-\u021bi iau cu alta sau cu am\u00e2ndou\u0103. Dar, dac\u0103 taxezi<\/strong>, formulezi efectiv acela\u0219i abuz \u00eentr-un altfel. <\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

Mai zic ei de cre\u0219terea impozitului pe dividende.

Taxes on dividend distributions to individuals should be increased from the current 8 percent to 10
percent, which is the rate of tax on interest income. This would raise revenues, reduce tax arbitrage
opportunities, and improve progressivity.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n


Las\u0103 c\u0103 a crescut deja, \u0219tie \u0219i ChatGPT de asta, dar ei probabil folosesc versiunea gratis \u0219i aia mai veche, dar unde e coaie studiul \u0103la care arat\u0103 c\u00e2\u0219tigurile crescute prin dezoportunizarea arbitrajului de taxe \u0219i de care arbitraj este vorba, mai exact \u0219i cum st\u0103 treaba cu promovarea antreprenoriatului la nivel micro – sau aia nu? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mai recomand\u0103 unirea impozitului pe teren cu cel pe cl\u0103diri – de ce? Pentru c\u0103 nu cunosc nimic, efectiv cu privire la Rom\u00e2nia.
\u00cen Rom\u00e2nia impozitele sunt defalcate pentru ca po\u021bi avea, la \u021bar\u0103 propriet\u0103\u021bi cu mai mult p\u00e2m\u00e2nt \u0219i o cocioab\u0103. \u0218i terenul nu e taxat foarte tare \u00een Rom\u00e2nia, a\u0219a cum \u0219i trebuie, c\u0103 dac\u0103 abuzezi de taxarea terenului duci popula\u021bia \u00een pozi\u021bia de chiria\u0219i \u0219i iobagi. \u0218i poate crezi c\u0103 a\u0219a \u0219i trebuie – gen MULT SUCCES C\u00c2ND VIN RU\u0218II, aha – hai cu recrut\u0103ri \u0219i cu patriotismul atunci!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Casa, \u00een Rom\u00e2nia , reprezint\u0103 un exponent al averii mai mult dec\u00e2t terenul. Plus c\u0103 ai tot felul de terenuri, unele sunt inravilane, cu diferite PUZ-uri, altele extravilane – pot fi \u00een aceea\u0219i parcel\u0103 da. \u0218i nu le po\u021bi unifica, c\u0103 nu-mi po\u021bi cere s\u0103 pl\u0103tesc la pre\u021b de intravilan de centrul ora\u0219ului porumbul – gen chiar dac\u0103 porumbul e \u00een centrul ora\u0219ului. Dac\u0103 e extravilan \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 nu m\u0103 la\u0219i s\u0103 construiesc pe el sau s\u0103 v\u00e2nd s\u0103 construiasc\u0103 al\u021bii.
La fel \u0219i construc\u021biile sunt de diferite tipuri, vechimi, materiale \u0219i clasific\u0103ri dup\u0103 valoarea utilitar\u0103 \u0219i altele.

Mai propun s\u0103 nu se mai scutesc\u0103 de la taxarea pe profit, profitul reinvestit, ci ar trebui s\u0103 se ofere maxim 50% eligibil pentru investi\u021bii, taxat \u0219i acela dar la o valoare mai mic\u0103. Mar\u0219, m\u0103 – s\u0103 v\u0103d studiile \u0219i bazat pe ce e recomandarea asta care limiteaz\u0103 investi\u021bii. Cel mai simplu e cu taxare forfetar\u0103 pe profitabilitate minim\u0103, dac\u0103 compania nu pl\u0103te\u0219te destule taxe gen.

O mai zic ei pe aia c\u0103 regimul microintreprinderilor ar trebui redus la acela\u0219i prag la care incepe codul de TVA – de ce? Vreun motiv , sau doar c\u0103 sun\u0103 armonios a\u0219a. Nu conteaz\u0103 c\u0103 a fost deja redus \u0219i c\u0103 avantajeaz\u0103 companiile mari \/ corpora\u021biile, conteaz\u0103 c\u0103 vreau analiza anume cu ce urm\u0103resc, c\u00e2t estimeaz\u0103 c\u0103 o s\u0103 str\u00e2ng\u0103 – bani \u0219i care o s\u0103 fie outputul economic la categoria aia , dup\u0103 asta. Din moment ce s-a \u00eent\u00e2mplat deja, m\u0103 g\u00e2ndesc c\u0103 puteau s\u0103 fi cerut datele statului rom\u00e2n. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bine\u00een\u021beles c\u0103 o bag\u0103 \u0219i pe aia cu TVA-ul ca s\u0103 fie, pentru o armonizare cu media european\u0103, lol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u0103, s\u0103-mi bag pula, \u0103\u0219tia n-au niciun fel de criterii ca s\u0103 lucrezi la ei. Dac\u0103 m\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lnesc vreodat\u0103 cu unul dintre autori (Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Wen, Parvina Rakhimova, sau John Norregaard), f\u0103r\u0103 o flegm\u0103 \u00een gur\u0103, v\u0103 promit c\u0103 nu scap\u0103 – pun poz\u0103 c\u00e2nd o fi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

De fapt, dac\u0103 lucra\u021bi la FMI \u0219i v\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lni\u021bi cu mine, cel mai bine s\u0103 nu-mi spune\u021bi unde lucra\u021bi c\u0103 v\u0103 scuip f\u0103r\u0103 alte comentarii.
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00cen cel mai r\u0103u, ar trebui prin\u0219i pe r\u00e2nd, c\u00e2nd vin \u00een \u021bar\u0103, b\u0103tu\u021bi cu pijamaua ud\u0103 \u00een beci \u0219i trimi\u0219i la reanimare la Sf.…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":31827,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"views":471,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/FMI-numai-retardati-cu-down.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4Eq23-8hi","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31824"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31828,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31824\/revisions\/31828"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/31827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}