

{"id":5602,"date":"2016-06-16T18:37:42","date_gmt":"2016-06-16T16:37:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/?p=5602"},"modified":"2016-06-16T18:37:42","modified_gmt":"2016-06-16T16:37:42","slug":"abuzul-in-serviciu-decizia-ccr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/?p=5602","title":{"rendered":"Abuzul \u00een serviciu. Decizia CCR."},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div>\n<p>Practic se \u00eenchide brut\u0103ria, probabil c\u0103 a ajuns prea mult\u0103 lume influent\u0103 acolo.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cencerc s\u0103 scriu articolul frumos, cu diacritice, cu virgulele, pe c\u00e2t se poate, la locul lor, s\u0103-mi limitez dreptul la liber\u0103 exprimare \u00eenc\u00e2t s\u0103 nu fie, ca de obicei, un text cu injurii de la un cap la altul.<\/p>\n<p><strong>P\u0103rerea mea, c\u0103 poate nu ave\u021bi r\u0103bdare s\u0103 citi\u021bi p\u00e2n\u0103 la cap\u0103t, e c\u0103 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biziday.ro\/2016\/06\/16\/ce-ticalosi-au-dezincriminat-abuzul-printr-un-infiorator-abuz\/\">Moise Guran are dreptate \u00een aprecierile din articolul s\u0103u de la un cap\u0103t p\u00e2n\u0103 la altul<\/a>, \u00eens\u0103 legea, a\u0219a cum era scris\u0103 era ambigu\u0103 , \u00een ceea ce m\u0103 prive\u0219te, \u0219i eu o consider neconstitu\u021bional\u0103, deci trebuie schimbat\u0103. Eh, era frumos s\u0103 mai fi durat p\u00e2n\u0103 c\u00e2nd \u00ee\u0219i executau pedepsele to\u021bi a\u0219tia \u00eenchi\u0219i, dar aia e.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u0218i acum s\u0103 detaliez p\u0103rerea mea.<\/p>\n<p>Textele\u00a0\u00een discu\u021bie:<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><b>Art. 297<\/b><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Abuzul \u00een serviciu<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legeaz.net\/noul-cod-penal\/art-297\">(1) Fapta func\u0163ionarului public care, \u00een exercitarea atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu, nu \u00eendepline\u015fte un act sau \u00eel \u00eendepline\u015fte \u00een mod defectuos \u015fi prin aceasta cauzeaz\u0103 o pagub\u0103 ori o v\u0103t\u0103mare a drepturilor sau intereselor legitime ale unei persoane fizice sau ale unei persoane juridice se pedepse\u015fte cu \u00eenchisoarea de la 2 la 7 ani \u015fi interzicerea exercit\u0103rii dreptului de a ocupa o func\u0163ie public\u0103.<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"sursa\">2.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/legeaz.net\/cod-penal-actualizat-2011\/art-246-cpen\"><b>INFRAC\u0162IUNI DE SERVICIU SAU \u00ceN LEG\u0102TUR\u0102 CU SERVICIUL<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legeaz.net\/cod-penal-actualizat-2011\/art-246-cpen\"><b>Art. 246<\/b><b><\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>Abuzul \u00een serviciu contra intereselor persoanelor<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legeaz.net\/cod-penal-actualizat-2011\/art-246-cpen\">Fapta func\u0163ionarului public, care, \u00een exerci\u0163iul atribu\u0163iilor sale de serviciu, cu \u015ftiin\u0163\u0103, nu \u00eendepline\u015fte un act ori \u00eel \u00eendepline\u015fte \u00een mod defectuos \u015fi prin aceasta cauzeaz\u0103 o v\u0103t\u0103mare intereselor legale ale unei persoane se pedepse\u015fte cu \u00eenchisoare de la 6 luni la 3 ani.<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"sursa\">Textul <strong>1<\/strong> are o problema. Orice idiot de la stat [insereaz\u0103 aici serviciu public , de la fisc p\u00e2n\u0103 la starea civil\u0103\u00a0] \u00a0care \u00ee\u021bi pune o \u0219tampil\u0103 prost pe un document , sau i\u021bi int\u00e2rzie un document ar fi pasibil\u0103, \u00een teorie, de \u00eenchisoare \u00a0de la 2 la 7 ani .<\/p>\n<p>\u0218tiu, sun\u0103 al dracului de bine , \u0219i p\u0103cat c\u0103 nu a\u021bi \u0219tiut p\u00e2n\u0103 acum de aceast\u0103 lege , c\u0103 nu a fost la TV \u0219i pe facebook , c\u0103 i-a\u021bi fi b\u0103gat voi pe to\u021bi la p\u00e2rnaie , to\u021bi care \u00a0\u0219i-au facut fa\u021b\u0103 de voi datoria \u00eentr-un mod defectuos.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen plus, cuv\u00e2ntul \u201ddefectuos\u201d nu prea exprim\u0103 abuzul , ci defectul , incompeten\u021ba, mai degrab\u0103, dar s\u0103 nu ne \u00eempiedic\u0103m \u00een detalii. \u0218tiu \u0219i eu ni\u0219te secretare de facultate pe care, dac\u0103 a\u0219 fi \u0219tiut atunci de textul \u0103sta legal , le-a\u0219 fi azv\u00e2rlit cu m\u00e2na mea \u00een p\u00e2rnaie, dimpreun\u0103 cu al\u021bii.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Doar c\u0103 e abuziv! E prea mult.\u00a0<\/strong>\u0218i voi \u00a0v\u0103 ve\u021bi fi f\u0103cut m\u0103car ocazional la serviciul vostru de priva\u021bi datoria defectuos. \u0218tiu, \u0219tiu , voi nu a\u021bi gre\u0219it nimic niciodat\u0103, voi v-a\u021bi n\u0103scut competen\u021bi , la fel \u0219i eu, \u00a0doar c\u0103 da\u021bi-mi voie s\u0103 nu v\u0103 cred, c\u0103 \u0219tiu cu ce fel de oameni m\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lnesc \u00een servicii \u0219i cu ce fel de oameni lucrez.<\/p>\n<p>\u0218tiu eu personal oameni care au cauzat pierderi directe \u0219i m\u0103surabile de 1 milion de EUR \/ zi cu un singur click. Nici m\u0103car nu au fost concedia\u021bi. Dar sigur, func\u021bionarii publici sunt acolo , pe banii no\u0219tri iar noi nu toler\u0103m a\u0219a ceva vrem s\u00e2nge.<\/p>\n<p>Deci nu! Termina\u021bi cu prostiile , ar fi ok \u00eentr-o \u021bar\u0103 unde oamenii nu au drepturi, dar dac\u0103 v\u0103 iau un pic la rost , to\u021bi gui\u021ba\u021bi despre drepturile omului c\u0103 \u00a0\u201ddomne, \u00a0nu ni se respect\u0103\u201d. Mie nu prea \u00eemi plac harnelile \u0103stea cu drepturile omului , a\u0219 vrea s\u0103 nu existe \u0219i s\u0103 fiu eu <em><strong>\u0219\u0103f\u00a0<\/strong><\/em> peste voi, dar na.<\/p>\n<p>Cu negarea\u00a0constitu\u021bionalit\u0103\u021bii celui de-al doilea text nu prea sunt de acord, c\u0103 buna \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u00a0cam exprim\u0103 abuzul \u0103la \u0219i sabotaj \u0219i inten\u021bie. De\u0219i sunt sigur c\u0103 un avocat poate explica cum poate s\u0103 existe bun\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 inten\u021bie. \u00a0Dar tot cred c\u0103 cu asta au cam fost m\u00e2rlani. Doar c\u0103 nu e decizia mea. Poate sunt lucruri care \u00eemi scap\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Pe de alt\u0103 parte, nici defini\u021bia dat\u0103 de CCR nu e neaparat ok. \u00a0Ei spun c\u0103 abuzul \u00een serviciu e valid dac\u0103 prin \u201ddefectuos\u201d se \u00een\u021belege \u201d\u00eenc\u0103lcarea legii\u201d. P\u0103i, \u00eenlocuind sintagma legea devine <strong>par\u021bial\u00a0<\/strong>redundant\u0103. Par\u021bial, pentru c\u0103 dac\u0103 deja \u00a0ac\u021biunile \u00a0catalogate defectuase au \u00eenc\u0103lcat deja legea, e simplu, te-ai g\u00e2ndi, vor \u00a0fi pedepsi\u021bi pentru \u00eenc\u0103lcarea legii \u0103lia, deja . Nu mai e nevoie de asta.<\/p>\n<p>Da, doar c\u0103 , po\u021bi \u00eenc\u0103lca legi care nu sunt penale, sau nu atrag sanc\u021biuni penale legate de alte circumstan\u021be , sau sunt mai mici sanc\u021biunile .<\/p>\n<p>S\u0103 zicem c\u0103 un func\u021bion\u0103ra\u0219 trebuie s\u0103 dea o h\u00e2rtie \u00eentr-un termen legal de 30 de zile. Termenul \u0103sta legal nu e sanc\u021bionabil cu \u00eenchisoarea, dar dac\u0103 e lege \u0219i o \u00eencalc\u0103 , iar \u00eencalcarea<del> duce la<\/del>\u00a0 constituie \u00eendeplinirea defectuoas\u0103 a meseriei lui, atunci e subiectul legii.<\/p>\n<p>Dar s\u0103 nu ne grabim cu interpretarea, pentru c\u0103 a\u0219a cum remarc\u0103 Guran, \u00a0Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 , nu poate cere modificarea legii, nici sugera interpret\u0103ri. E o dep\u0103\u0219ire a cadrului legal, deci practic , da ei comit acum un abuz \u00een serviciu \u0219i ar trebui sanc\u021biona\u021bi cu \u00eenchisoare de la 2 la 7 ani , \u00een special pentru implca\u021biile patrimoniale \u0219i legate de amnistie pe care le are decizia lor. Doar c\u0103, nu mai pot fi condamna\u021bi pentru c\u0103 \u0219i-au declarat fix legea care-i oprea s\u0103 emit\u0103 mizeria asta ca fiind neconstitu\u021bional\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Vorba aia : \u201dDin aceast\u0103 dilem\u0103 nu pute\u021bi ie\u0219i!\u201d. Tare, nu?<\/p>\n<p>Oricum ar fi, e cam limpede c\u0103 abuzul e reglementat prost \u0219i c\u0103 DNAul l-au exploatat p\u00e2n\u0103 acum.<\/p>\n<p>\u0218i acum s\u0103 vorbim despre implica\u021bii.<\/p>\n<p>C\u0103 vor ie\u0219i oameni din pu\u0219c\u0103rie \u0219i nu vor mai intra unii. \u00a0A\u0219a e. Dar a\u0219a e \u0219i normal , fie ca ne convine sau nu.<\/p>\n<p>Dac\u0103 un \u00a0primar care ne e antipatic (25% din cei ale\u0219i, din ce \u00een\u021beleg ) \u00a0e acuzat de abuz \u00een serviciu , iar abuzul nu const\u0103 \u00een ilegalit\u0103\u021bi va fi achitat. Dac\u0103 e deja \u00een pu\u0219c\u0103rie, poate cere anularea pedepsei \u0219i va fi, probabil, <strong>eliberat.<\/strong> B\u0103, chit c\u0103 nu ne place nou\u0103, chit c\u0103 el tot e vinovat\u00a0<strong>\u00a0de ceva,\u00a0<\/strong>sau c\u0103\u00a0<strong>\u0219tim noi\u00a0<\/strong> c\u0103\u00a0<strong>sigur e vinovat,\u00a0<\/strong> justi\u021bia ar trebui s\u0103 func\u021bioneze altfel. Nu a\u0219a.<\/p>\n<p>Problema e, iar\u0103\u0219i, cum o pune Guran, c\u0103 \u00a0legea nu e neconsttu\u021bional\u0103 doar pe jum\u0103tate, pentru c\u0103 a\u0219a a zis un neterminat de la CCR, care pentru asta e condamnabil, dup\u0103 legea veche, evident, ci e neconstitu\u021bional\u0103\u00a0<strong>\u0219i at\u00e2t.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u0218i cred c\u0103 oricine a fost condamnat sau este acuzat de \u00eenc\u0103lcarea legii \u0103\u0219tia poate invoca excep\u021bia de constitu\u021bionalitate admis\u0103 \u0219i pleac\u0103 frumos acas\u0103 liber. Da, da, \u00a0\u0219i Udrea!<\/p>\n<p>P\u0103i e frumos?\u00a0<strong>Nu e! E ca dracu de ur\u00e2t , e clar c\u0103 iar ne-au tras-o, e clar c\u0103 iar fac mi\u0219to de noi \u0219i e ur\u00e2t s\u0103 vezi asta. Da, sunt sigur c\u0103 \u0219i-au calculat to\u021bi pa\u0219ii \u0219i c\u0103 ne-au b\u0103gat-o pe sub u\u0219\u0103 la momentul potrivit. C\u00e2teodata am impresia c\u0103 fac legile at\u00e2t de mizerabil special ca s\u0103 le poat\u0103 anula c\u00e2nd le sunt inoportune.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dar nu conteaz\u0103. Justi\u021bia e oarb\u0103. Legea e proast\u0103 , nu e ok s\u0103 condamni dup\u0103 ea.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ce ar fi de f\u0103cut? \u00a0Parlamentul ar trebui s\u0103 refac\u0103 legile \u0103stea dou\u0103 \u00a0<strong>imediat.\u00a0<\/strong> S\u0103 legifereze\u00a0constitu\u021bional, nu neap\u0103rat conform sugestiei CCR, dar constitu\u021bional. Astfel ca actualii judeca\u021bi sau de\u021binu\u021bi dup\u0103 lege a\u0219a cum e ea acum, s\u0103 nu poat\u0103 sc\u0103pa invoc\u00e2nd excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate ci maxim, invoc\u00e2nd legea cea mai favorabil\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Se va face asta ? Umm, \u0219tii suntem \u00een iunie \u0219i nu \u0219tiu dac\u0103 a \u00eenceput deja vacan\u021ba parlamentar\u0103 , dar cred c\u0103 e pe vine. A\u0219a c\u0103 \u00a0NU.<\/p>\n<p>Cum spuneam, \u00a0e fix \u00a0cum spune Guran , dar legea e abuziv\u0103 \u0219i trebuie schimbat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Ne-au f\u0103cut \u0219i de data asta.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Practic se \u00eenchide brut\u0103ria, probabil c\u0103 a ajuns prea mult\u0103 lume influent\u0103 acolo. \u00cencerc s\u0103 scriu articolul frumos, cu diacritice, cu virgulele, pe c\u00e2t se&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5606,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[744,170],"tags":[1210,1214,1215,1211,908,1212,1213],"class_list":["post-5602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-and-order","category-politice","tag-abuz-in-servciu","tag-arrt-246","tag-art-297","tag-ccr","tag-lege","tag-politicieni","tag-puscarie"],"views":1478,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/babaoarba.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4Eq23-1sm","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5602"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5607,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5602\/revisions\/5607"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/5606"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/catalinx.ro\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}